Sarkar and Sharma (1990) examined fines migration in two Berea core samples, one of them containing residual oil (ROS). Data for the two core tests are given in Table 11-1. The core samples were first saturated with 3% NaCl brine. Formation damage due to fines migration took place upon fresh water injection. Values of some model parameters were gathered from Khilar and Fogler (1983) while the others were obtained by matching the model responses to the measured data, as summarized in Table 11-2.

The simulation study also confirms that formation damage in the presence of oil is less pronounced. As can be seen in Table 11-2, the amount of formation fines that can be released from the pore surface, αfp°, is 20% less and the rate constant for fines release due to colloidal effects, kcr, fp,w, is 35% lower in the presence of residual oil. Sarkar (1988) conducted a laboratory test using a Berea core of 8.27 cm in length to investigate fines migration in two-phase flow. The core porosity and permeability initially were 0.21 fraction and 0.122 Darcy, respectively. The core saturated with crude oil was displaced with 3%

NaCl brine. Berea sandstones generally do not suffer from permeability reduction during a brine flood. Neglecting the effects of capillary pressure, the model was used to simulate the two-phase flow test.An oil flood was then carried out to reestablish the connate water saturation. The core was finally displaced with fresh water and formation damage took place due to fines migration in two-phase flow. Using the relative permeabilities obtained from the two-phase flow test without formation damage, simulation was carried out to match measured pressure drop as shown in this article. Alteration in the rock permeability, indicates that formation damage due to fines migration in two-phase flow of oil and fresh water is similar to that of single-phase flow of fresh water in the presence of residual oil. Detailed information on core data and model parameters in this case is presented elsewhere (Liu and Civan, 1995).

Damage by Particle Invasion

Experimental data of two similar core samples conducted by Eleri and Ursin (1992) were used to analyze formation damage due to particle invasion. The two samples were labeled as Core #26 and Core #27 in the Eleri and Ursin (1992) study. Prior to flow tests, the core samples

were treated to eliminate formation fines migration. Latex particles of less than 3 microns in size suspended in water were injected into Core #26 at the concentration of 0.5 x 10-4 gm/cm3 and into Core #27 at the concentration of 2.0 x 10-4 gm/cm3. Simulations were performed to examine the two tests. Permeability alteration versus cumulative volume of injected fluid is illustrated in Figure 11-6 including a comparison between experimental and simulated results. Detailed information on core data and model parameters in this case is presented by Liu and Civan (1993). All model parameters for the two core tests are the same except thatfmin = 0.58 for Core #26 and f„,,-„ = 0.41 for Core #27. The difference reveals that higher particle concentration causes more pores being plugged. Both experimental and simulation results indicate that particle concentration is a major factor for formation damage caused by particle invasion.

Damage by Mud Filtration

Rahman and Marx (1991) studied formation damage by mud filtration. A core sample was contaminated by circulating a drilling fluid over the surface of core inlet under a constant differential pressure of 34.54 atm across the core. Before mud filtration, the core was saturated with 1.5% KC1 water to prevent formation fines migration. Permeability

alteration along the core was measured after one hour of mud contamination. Data for the core test and values of model parameters for simulation are presented elsewhere by Liu and Civan (1993). Experimental and simulated results for drilling fluid loss versus time and permeability alteration versus core distance after one hour of mud contamination are illustrated in this article. Simulation results indicate that the model can favorably represent the process of mud filtration. Another laboratory test involving dynamic mud filtration was conducted by Jiao and Sharma (1992).

A fresh water-based mud was circulated over the surface of core inlet and infiltrated into a Berea core under an average differential pressure of 6.29 atm across the system. This Berea core sample was previously saturated with 3% NaCl brine. Formation damage in this test is caused by external solid invasion and formation fines migration. Pressure taps were placed at different locations along the core of 20.34 cm in length to measure permeability change during the test. Experimental results of permeability alteration in the core section between 6.35 cm and 11.43 cm from core inlet compare quite well with simulation results. Further discussion on the simulation of this test is presented elsewhere (Liu and Civan, 1993).

Prediction of formation damage due to dynamic mud filtration in twophase flow was also carried out to demonstrate the capacity and application of the model and to provide a comparison with single-phase flow results. If the core studied by Jiao and Sharma (1992) was saturated by oil prior to mud filtration, the invasion of the water-based mud would lead to two-phase flow of oil and water in the rock. The same model parameters determined above for mud filtration in single-phase flow were used. Additional data necessary for simulation, including connate water saturation, residual oil saturation and relative permeabilities, are adapted from the case of fines migration in two-phase flow that was also simulated above.

These results indicate that filtration volume and formation damage are significantly less when a water-based mud invades an oil-bearing formation. This is because the total mobility for simultaneous two-phase flow of water and oil is usually less than that of single phase of water in formations, especially in Berea sandstones, which are generally strongly water-wet and have a very low permeability for water phase with the presence of oil in the formations.


Abboud, N. M., "Formation of Filter Cakes with Particle Penetration at the Filter Septum," Paniculate Science and Technology, Vol. 11, 1993, pp. 115-131.

Adin, A., "Prediction of Granular Water Filter Performance for Optimum Design," Filtration and Separation, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1978, pp. 55-60.

Arshad, S. A., "A Study of Surfactant Precipitation in Porous Media with Applications in Surfactant-Assisted Enhanced Oil Recovery Processes," Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Oklahoma, 1991, 285 p.

Chase, G. G., & Willis, M. S., "Compressive Cake Filtration," Chem. Engng. ScL, Vol. 47, No. 6, 1992, pp. 1373-1381.

Chen, W., "Solid-Liquid Separation via Filtration," Chemical Engineering, Vol. 104, February 1997, pp. 66-72.

Civan, F., "A Multi-Phase Mud Filtrate Invasion and Well Bore Filter Cake Formation Model," SPE 28709 paper, Proceedings of the SPE International Petroleum Conference & Exhibition of Mexico, Veracruz, Mexico, October 10-13, 1994, pp. 399-412.

Civan, F., "A Multi-Purpose Formation Damage Model," SPE 31101 paper, Proceedings of the SPE Formation Damage Control Symposium held in Lafayette, Louisiana, February 14-15, 1996, pp. 311-326.

Civan, F, "Incompressive Cake Filtration: Mechanism, Parameters, and Modeling," AIChE J., Vol. 44, No. 11, November 1998a, pp. 2379-2387.

Civan, F., "Practical Model for Compressive Cake Filtration Including Fine Particle Invasion," AIChE J., Vol. 44, No. 11, November 1998b, pp. 2388-2398.

Civan, F., "Predictive Model for Filter Cake Buildup and Filtrate Invasion with Non-Darcy Effects," SPE 52149 paper, Proceedings of the 1999 SPE Mid-Continent Operations Symposium held in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, March 28-31, 1999a.

Civan, F., "Phenomenological Filtration Model for Highly Compressible Filter Cakes Involving Non-Darcy Flow," SPE 52147 paper, Proceedings of the 1999 SPE Mid-Continent Operations Symposium held in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, March 28-31, 1999b.

Clark, P. E., & Barbat, O., "The Analysis of Fluid-Loss Data," SPE 18971 paper, Proc., SPE Joint Rocky Mountain Regional/Low Permeability Reservoirs Symposium and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, March 6-8, 1989, pp. 437-444.

Collins, E. R., Flow of Fluids Through Porous Materials, Penn Well Publishing Co., Tulsa, Oklahoma, 1961, 270 p.

Corapcioglu, M. Y., & Abboud, N. M., "Cake Filtration with Particle Penetration at the Cake Surface," SPE Reservoir Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 3, August 1990, pp. 317-326.

Dake, L. P., Fundamentals of Reservoir Engineering, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., New York, 1978, 443 p.

Darcy, H., "Les Fontaines Publiques de la Ville de Dijon," Dalmount, Paris (1856).

Darley, H. C. H., "Prevention of Productivity Impairment by Mud Solids," Petroleum Engineer, September 1975, pp. 102-110.

de Nevers, N., "Product in the Way Processes," Chemical Engineering Education, Summer 1992, pp. 146-151.

Donaldson, E. C., & Chernoglazov, V, "Drilling Mud Fluid Invasion Model," J. Pet. Sci. Eng., Vol. 1, No. 1, 1987, pp. 3-13.

Fehlberg, E., "Low-Order Classical Runge-Kutta Formulas with Stepsize Control and their Application to Some Heat Transfer Problems," NASA TR R-315, Huntsville, Alabama, July 1969.

Fisk, J. V., Shaffer, S. S., & Helmy, S., "The Use of Filtration Theory in Developing a Mechanism for Filter-Cake Deposition by Drilling Fluids in Laminar Flow," SPE Drilling Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 3, September 1991, pp. 196-202.

Forchheimer, P., "Wasserbewegung durch Boden," Zeitz. ver. Deutsch Ing. Vol. 45, 1901, pp. 1782-1788.

Hermia, J., "Constant Pressure Blocking Filtration Laws—Application to Power-Law Non-Newtonian Fluids," Trans. IChemE, Vol. 60, 1982, pp. 183-187.

Jiao, D., & Sharma, M. M., "Mechanism of Cake Buildup in Crossflow Filtration of Colloidal Suspensions," J. Colloid and Interface Sci., Vol. 162, 1994, pp. 454-462.

Jones, S. C., & Roszelle, W. O., "Graphical Techniques for Determining Relative Permeability from Displacement Experiments," Journal of Petroleum Technology, Trans AIM E, Vol. 265, 1978, pp. 807-817.

Liu, X., & Civan, F, "Formation Damage and Filter Cake Buildup in Laboratory Core Tests: Modeling and Model-Assisted Analysis," SPE Formation Evaluation J., Vol. 11, No. 1, March 1996, pp. 26-30.

Liu, X., Civan, F, and Evans, R. D., "Correlation of the Non-Darcy Flow Coefficient," Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, Vol. 34, No. 10, December 1995, pp. 50-54.

Metzner, A. B., & Reed, J. C., "Flow of Non-Newtonian Fluids—Correlation of the Laminar, Transition, and Turbulent Flow Regions," AIChE J., Vol. 1, No. 4, 1955, pp. 434-440.

Peng, S. J., & Peden, J. M., "Prediction of Filtration Under Dynamic Conditions," SPE 23824 paper, presented at the SPE Intl. Symposium on Formation Damage Control held in Lafayette, Louisiana, February 26- 27, 1992, pp. 503-510.

Potanin, A. A., & Uriev, N. B., "Micro-rheological Models of Aggregated Suspensions in Shear Flow," /. Coll. Int. ScL, Vol. 142, No. 2, 1991, pp. 385-395.

Ravi, K. M, Beirute, R. M., & Covington, R. L., "Erodability of Partially Dehydrated Gelled Drilling Fluid and Filter Cake," SPE 24571 paper, Proceedings of the 67th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the SPE held in Washington, DC, October 4-7, 1992, pp. 219-234.

Sherman, N. E., & Sherwood, J. D., "Cross-Flow Filtration: Cakes With Variable Resistance and Capture Efficiency," Chemical Engineering Science, Vol. 48, No. 16, 1993, pp. 2913-2918.

Smiles, D. E., & Kirby, J. M., "Compressive Cake Filtration—A Comment," Chem. Engng. ScL, Vol. 48, No. 19, 1993, pp. 3431-3434.

Tien, C., Bai, R., & Ramarao, B. V., "Analysis of Cake Growth in Cake Filtration: Effect of Fine Particle Retention, AIChE J., Vol. 43, No. 1, January 1997 pp. 33-44.

Tiller, F. M., & Crump, J. R., "Recent Advances in Compressible Cake Filtration Theory," in Mathematical Models and Design Methods in Solid-Liquid Separation, A. Rushton, ed., Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, 1985.

Willis, M. S., Collins, R. M., & Bridges, W. G., "Complete Analysis of Non-Parabolic Filtration Behavior," Chem. Eng. Res. Des., Vol. 61, March 1983, pp. 96-109.

Xie, X., & Charles, D. D., "New Concepts in Dynamic Fluid-Loss Modeling of Fracturing Fluids," J. Petroleum Science and Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 1/2, February 1997, pp. 29-40.