File:Tie Back Field Architecture.png
Tie Back Field Architecture
File:FCU Field Architechture.png
FCU Field Architechture
File:FPSO Field Architecture.png
FPSO Field Architecture
File:FPU Connection Module.png
FPU Connection Module

For wet tree system, the subsea field layout usually comprises two types: subsea wells clusters and direct access wells. Direct access is only applied in marginal field development. All such developments are usually based on semi-submersible floating production and drilling units (FPDUs) with oil export either via pipeline or to a nearby floating storage and offloading (FSO) unit, providing direct and cost-effective access from the surface to the wells to allow for workover or drilling activities directly from the production support, especially for deepwater interventions. A subsea cluster of wells gathers the production in the most efficient and cost-effective way from nearby subsea wells, or (when possible) from a remote /distant subsea tie-back to an already existing infrastructure based on either a floating production, storage and offloading (FPSO) or a floating production unit (FPU), depending on the region considered. The subsea tie-back system normally can be regarded as a supplement for subsea cluster well developments. The FPUhas variousways to export the oil or gas. Typically a barge, semi-submersible, or even a mini-TLP type vessel is used. The FPSO usually utilizes a ship-shaped or barge-type vessel as the host structure that is moored either via a turret and weathervaning system to allow for tandem offloading or spread moored with offloading via a distant buoy or still in tandem mode. For both subsea well clusters or subsea direct-access wells, the three main riser options would be vertical top tensioned risers, steel catenary risers, and flexible risers. Pending use of the above field architectures and risers in conjunction with particular flow assurance design criteria, these wet tree system would be the most effective.


  • C. Claire, L. Frank, Design Challenges of Deepwater Dry Tree Riser Systems for Different Vessel Types, ISOPE Conference, Cupertino, 2003.
  • M. Faulk, FMC ManTIS (Manifolds & Tie-in Systems), SUT Subsea Awareness Course, Houston, 2008.
  • R. Eriksen, et al., Performance Evaluation of Ormen Lange Subsea Compression Concepts, Offshore, May 2006.
  • CITEPH, Long Tie-Back Development, Saipem, 2008.
  • R. Sturgis, Floating Production System Review, SUT Subsea Awareness Course, Houston, 2008.
  • Y. Tang, R. Blais, Z. Schmidt, Transient Dynamic Characteristics of Gas-lift unloading Process, SPE 38814, 1997.
  • DEEPSTAR, The State of Art of Subsea Processing, Part A, Stress Engineering Services (2003).
  • P. Lawson, I. Martinez, K. Shirley, Improving Deepwater Production through Subsea ESP Booster Systems, inDepth, The Baker Hughes Technology Magazine, vol. 13 (No 1) (2004).
  • G. Mogseth, M. Stinessen, Subsea Processing as Field Development Enabler, FMC, Kongsberg Subsea, Deep Offshore Technology Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 2004.
  • S.L. Scott, D. Devegowda, A.M. Martin, Assessment of Subsea Production & Well Systems, Department of Petroleum Engineering, Texas A&M University, Project 424 of MMS, 2004.
  • International Standards Organization, Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries-Design and Operation of the Subsea Production Systems, Part 1: General Requirements and Recommendations, ISO 13628-1, 2005.
  • O. Jahnsen, G. Homstvedt, G.I. Olsen, Deepwater Multiphase Pumping System, DOT International Conference & Exhibition, Parc Chanot, France, 2003.